Julien Murzi: Noncognitivism in ethics (seminar)

What do moral statements mean? If killing is wrong, what, if anything, makes the sentence 'Killing is wrong' true? In this seminar we introduce and critically review a number of noncognitivist approaches to metaethics, i.e. approaches that deny that moral statements are true, or false, in virtue of objective features of the world. For instance, on some of these approaches, to say that killing is wrong is just to express an attitude of disapproval towards killing; on some other approaches, 'Killing is wrong' is true, even though there is no natural property in the world that makes this sentence true. But can a noncognitivist treatment of moral statements be viable? If so, what lessons can we learn about moral facts and the metaphysics of morality more generally? In answering these questions, we will largely follow Mark Schroeder's excellent book Noncognitivism in ethics, but we will also read a few classic, and more recent, papers along the way.

Iulian Toader: Climate Ethics

Major climate changes, such as the increase of global temperatures due to accummulation of carbon dioxide in the air and the rise of global average sea level, as well as their undeniable harmful consequences, have called for transformations of both technology and human behavior. Mitigation based on emission cuts has been the main focus of our response strategies to keep global warming as far below under 2ºC as possible. This seminar will consider the moral questions raised by these strategies. In particular, we will discuss questions about fairness in sharing the associated economic burden among countries, questions about justice towards climate refugees, future generations, and non-human species, as well as questions related to what, if anything, each and every one of us is morally obligated to do in the face of imminent dangerous climate changes.


Johannes Brandl: Varieties of Folk Psychology (lecture course + exercise course)

Folk psychology is not a single thing but a variety of strategies for understanding other people that we use in daily life.  According to cognitive psychology, what underpins our folk psychological skills is a specific faculty for "mindreading". In this course, we will examine the debate in philosophy of mind arising from the psychological literature on mindreading. Part 1 focuses on the differences between a theory-theory approach and a simulation approach to mindreading. Part 2 considers objections that target both kinds of theories as well as so-called hybrid theories of mindreading. Part 3 looks at possible alternatives, emphasizing the role of embodied cognition, interpersonal engagements, and narrative practices. At the end of the course, students will appreciate the challenge of giving a pluralistic account of our folk psychological abilities.

Summer Semester

BrettTopey: What is truth? (lecture course + exercise course)  

When we say that a sentence (or a proposition, or a belief) is true, we plausibly are attributing to that sentence (or proposition, or belief) a certain property: the property of truth. But what is this property, exactly? Intuitively, the answer seems simple: truth is just agreement with the facts of the world. But this on its own is only an uninformative platitude, and developing it into a full theory of truth turns out to be more difficult than one might think -- doing so would require both explaining what sort of object a fact is and making sense of what it is for a thing of that sort to be in agreement with a sentence. Can we meet these requirements and thereby develop our platitude into a satisfactory theory, or are we going to need some different account of what the property of truth consists in? Or might we have been mistaken in assuming that truth is really a property in the first place?   In this course, students will systematically investigate these questions by examining classical and contemporary philosophical theories of truth.

Christopher Gauker: The Cognitive Nature of Skills (seminar)


Iulian Toader:  Metaphysics and Science (lecture course + exercise course)  

This course is an introduction to the problem of the relationship between science and metaphysics and, more particularly, of the impact of contemporary science on metaphysical issues like material constitution and persistence, time and change, laws and causation, freedom and determinism, etc. We will address questions like What is a material object? What are laws of nature? What does fundamentally exist? What is the relationship between fundamental and non-fundamental ontology? What is the relationship between natural modality and metaphysical modality? We will consider such issues as they are typically discussed nowadays in analytic metaphysics, but steadily move towards a more scientifically-informed discussion of them.

Peter Simons: Metaphysics of Quantities

Since Plato first wrote about the forms, philosophers have discussed entities which are neither in space nor time, nor have any causal role. These are abstract entities or abstract objects. And ever since then, there have been philosophers who denied that there are such things, starting with Plato’s own student Aristotle. This course discusses in depth the fiercely disputed case of abstract objects: who accepts them (platonists) and who rejects them (nominalists), why one should or should not believe in them, and for what reasons. The kinds of abstract objects that have been put forward fall into at least five categories: universals, mathematical objects, semantic objects such as meanings, fictions, and states of affairs. These may or may not overlap, and the reasons for accepting or rejecting them vary from one to another. What are the advantages and problems for platonists, and conversely, what are the advantages and problems for nominalists? Is there any way in which the dispute between those for and those against abstract objects could be resolved? The course will provide a brief historical overview, a taxonomy, and detailed discussions of the arguments and tools available to both sides, enabling students to concentrate on a selected case or aspect of the dispute.

Mariangela Cocchiaro: Recent Topics in Formal Epistemology 

The questions that drive formal epistemology are often the same as those in “informal” epistemology. What is knowledge, and how is it different from mere opinion? When is a belief justified? What it means for something to be evidence for a hypothesis?And yet, the tools on which formal epistemologists rely in order to reply to these questions share much history and interest with other fields, both inside and outside philosophy. A formal epistemologist might, for example, draw on probability theory to explain how scientific reasoning works. Or she might use modal logic to argue for a particular theory of knowledge.In this course we will start by surveying Bayesian/probabilistic models of belief and modal representations of belief and knowledge, in the tradition of von Wright and Hintikka. Then we will shift direction and investigate how these tools are put to use in order to reply to some of the standard philosophical questions from traditional epistemology.

  • News
    Welche Studentinnen und Studenten in Österreich spenden am meisten Blut? Das war die Challenge des „Vampire Cups“ vom Österreichischen Roten Kreuz. Universitäten und Fachhochschulen aus Wien, Niederösterreich, Burgenland, der Steiermark, Oberösterreich, Salzburg und Tirol haben am Wettbewerb teilgenommen – die Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Salzburg konnte jetzt den Pokal mit nach Hause nehmen.
    Gemeinsam mit 400 Alumni verbrachten Rektor Heinrich Schmidinger, der künftige Rektor Hendrik Lehnert, die vier Dekane und der Senatsvorsitzende einen Sommerabend auf der „schönsten Terrasse Salzburgs“ im Restaurant M32 am Mönchsberg.
    Mit gebündelter Unterstützung des Chinazentrums und des Kinderbüros der Universität Salzburg wurden bereits letzte Woche Vorbereitungen getroffen: Gastprofessorin Wei Li erklärt: „Wir übten chinesische Schriftzeichen: Anlassbedingt als erstes „Hallo“ und „Willkommen“ für ein Begrüßungsbanner.“
    Das Zentrum zur Erforschung des Christlichen Ostens (ZECO) der Universität Salzburg hielt vom 20. bis 27. Juni 2019 einen der größten internationalen Wissenschaftskongresse Kasachstans ab.
    Insgesamt 50 Personen von unterschiedlichen renommierten chinesischen Institutionen, die sich mit den Menschenrechten auseinandersetzen und unter der Leitung von Herrn Prof. Kaminski, Chinaexperte aus Wien, und Herrn LU Guangjin, Generalsekretär der China Society for Human Rights Studies in Peking besuchten am 20. Juni die Rechtswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Salzburg.
    Die Anmeldung zu den Kursen der ditact_women´s IT summer studies ist in vollem Gange. Noch bis 08. Juli läuft die erste Anmeldefrist, danach wird die Restplatzbörse geöffnet.
    Der Botanische Garten lädt ein zu einer kostenlosen Führung! Treffpunkt: Eingang zum Botanischen Garten. Dauer: ca. zwei Stunden. Die Führung findet bei jedem Wetter statt. Botanischer Garten, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34.
    Die 7. Salzburg Summer School findet vom 02. bis 03. September 2019 statt. Es wird ein umfassendes pädagogisches Sommerfortbildungsprogramm für Lehrkräfte und Lehramtsstudierende aller Schulformen und Unterrichtsfächer angeboten. Anmeldungen sind möglich.
  • Veranstaltungen
  • 23.07.19 Salzburger Apotheker-Kräutergarten
  • Alumni Club
  • Uni-Shop
  • Facebook-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Twitter-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Instagram-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Flickr-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Vimeo-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg