Susanna Melkonian

As is the Intentional Object of Emotion so must be its Phenomenology? ?Brentano?s Most Striking Thesis? as Explanans.

One of the most recent debates on Brentano (1874) concerns his self-representational theory of consciousness – according to which ‘[[e]very conscious act] includes within it a consciousness of itself. Therefore, every [conscious] act, no matter how simple, has a double object, a primary and a secondary object. The simplest act, for example the act of hearing, has as its primary object the sound, and for its secondary object, itself, the mental phenomenon in which the sound is heard.’ (ibid: 153f., cited from Kriegel forthcoming in D. Fisette and G. Fréchette, emphasis added). When Montague (2009) refers to Brentano’s idea of a primary and a secondary object in her ‘sui-generis’ account of emotion, she emphasizes that she uses these terms in a quite different sense. Although ‘sui generis’ normally means that the emotion’s intentionality is in its essence phenomenal, Montague assumes that the secondary object of an experience is not the experience itself but “part of the experience, and more particularly, part of its phenomenological character.” (ibid: 184, footnote 28). However, in regard to genuinely phenomenal experiences like emotions it is a little confusing to say that the “thick content of an experience […] includes phenomenological content as well as thin content” (ibid: 174, emphasis added). As Montague first treats phenomenological content as, so to say, a “counterpart” to thin content, she further explains that it “is in virtue of the subject being aware of the affective phenomenology of being sad about the cat’s death that it [the affective phenomenology] contributes to that experience’s being sad about the sadness of the cat’s death […] (ibid: 184, emphasis added).” In more simple words Montague says that “feeling sad about the cat’s death experientially represents the disvalue of the cat’s death (ibid: 187, emphasis added).” Thus, emotions seem not only to represent thin contents like cats’ deaths but emotions are rather (evaluative) experiences of an external object as ‘the sad’, ‘the joyful’, etc. So after all, Montague seems to argue for a phenomenal intentional view of the emotion’s intentionality. In the end, she holds that the “affective phenomenology of an emotional experience − […] the secondary object of the experience - contributes essentially to that experience’s having the primary object it has” (ibid: 184, emphasis added). Indeed, we seem to do more justice to the emotion’s intentionality when we suppose clearly that an emotion has its primary object it has because the primary object in question is embedded in the affective phenomenology, that is, in the very mental phenomenon in question. Furthermore, Montague’s claim that the ‘evaluative content’ of emotions is determined by their affective phenomenology can also be understood as a claim about emotions’ self-representational character. Mendelovici’s (forthcoming) identity version of intentionalism seems to capture well Brentano’s idea of a secondary object. On Mendelovici’s view emotions represent their intentional objects as having ‘affective properties’. Affective properties happen to be un-instantiated - ‘Edenic’ (see Chalmers 2006) − properties. This sui generis view of emotion seems to better capture the self-representational character of emotion as it supposes that emotionally evaluating an external object ‘as sad’ (due to identity) simply is affectively representing the very object. On the other hand, like Montague, Mendelovici does not sufficiently pay attention to the primary object itself. The external object of an experience seems to be an essential component of Brentano’s most striking thesis. As quoted above, Brentano emphasizes:

The simplest act, for example, the act of hearing, has as its primary object the sound, and for its secondary object, itself, the mental phenomenon in which the sound is heard.” (ibid: 153f., emphasis added). One reading of this quote suggests that, as the act of hearing is directed towards something that can only be experienced when it is heard; the act of hearing thus represents also itself. As Kriegel further explains, “a mental state is conscious when, and only when, it represents itself in the right way” (ibid: x, emphasis added). Emotion theorists commonly agree that we − besides basic emotions that involve affective, thus physiological and expressive, reactions towards physical stimuli − also have cognitive emotions (see Zinck & Newen 2008). An essential component of cognitive emotions is their ‘cognitive content’. Being for instance joyous about a clear composition of a Beethoven symphony involves the belief that clear compositions are something special (cf. ibid). If we accept that such emotional experiences essentially involve cognitive evaluations, then affective phenomenology should also be able to account for them. But the experience of a clear Beethoven composition as ‘joyful’ seems to rather be characterized by the fact that we experience the clear Beethoven composition as a clear composition. Accordingly, we deploy concepts like CLEAR COMPOSITION. More generally, in order to consider an emotional experience as the experience of a social object, the external object in question must be embedded in the kind of emotion in which social kinds can be adequately represented. It seems therefore that the conscious experience of such objects as clear compositions necessarily requires the deployment of corresponding concepts. In that sense, a cognitive emotion can hardly represent itself in ‘the right way’ when it does not represent the social kind in the very way in which that kind is to be experienced. The emotional evaluation of a social object must differ from emotionally evaluating a physical object. Therefore, the cognitive emotion’s self-representational character must be beyond affective phenomenology. Then affect and evaluation (thus including think content) must indeed be considered as being counterparts within an emotion’s thick content. A cognitive emotion might include affect − but affect is then neither identical to nor a constitutive element of cognitive evaluation. It must rather be the cognitive evaluation itself that “characterizes” the distinctive phenomenology of the cognitive kind of emotion. The ‘the right way’ must be a kind of ‘cognitive phenomenology’ in which the cognitive emotion represents its primary object as having not affective sui generis, but rather such clearly ‘evaluative properties’.

  • ENGLISH English
  • News
    Univ.-Prof. Dr. Nicola Hüsing wurde für ihre bisherigen wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten ausgezeichnet und für die EURASC nominiert.
    Dr. Lorenz Aglas, senior scientist der Arbeitsgruppe Ferreira im Fachbereich Biowissenschaften, ist Gewinner des AK-Wissenschaftspreises der Arbeiterkammer Salzburg.
    Für den 8. Paris Lodron Ball sind keine Karten mehr erhältlich. Die genehmigte Gästezahl für die Alte Residenz ist erreicht. Danke! www.uni-salzburg.at/ball
    Become an expert in EU politics, law and economics
    Von 17.-19.Oktober 2018 wurden wieder die Media Literacy Awards (MLA) verliehen. Damit zeichnet das Bundesministerium alljährlich die innovativsten medienpädagogischen Projekte an europäischen Schulen aus. Diesmal ging der Award in der Kategorie „Multimedia“ an das Projekt „Speak OUT“, ein Speaking VLog den Mag. Julia Weißenböck, MSc, BA, Fachdidaktikerin für Englisch an der Universität Salzburg, gemeinsam mit ihrer 3. Klasse in Englisch umgesetzt hat.
    An der Kultur- und Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät erfolgten am 27. November 2018 die Antrittsvorlesungen der Professoren für Journalistik, Rudolf Renger, und für Geschichts- und Politikdidaktik, Christoph Kühberger.
    Die sog. Beißergruppe, die im späten 17. Jh.in einer römischen Villa bei Grottaferrata inLatium gefunden wurde und sich heute im BritishMuseum in London befindet, gibt zwei Knabenwieder, die beim Knöchelspiel in Streit geratensind...
    Die Entstehungsgeschichte vieler chinesischer Volksmusikinstrumente lässt sich weit über tausend Jahre zurückverfolgen.
    Stella A. Berger und Jens C. Nejstgaard halten am 18. Januar 2019 um 14:00 Uhr im HS 436 der NW-Fakultät jeweils einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Novel research tools: ice control in lake enclosures & deep-learning imager reveal fine-scale plankton patterns". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften lödt herzlich dazu ein!
    Podiumsdiskussion, 19.01.2018, 16:00 Uhr, Unipark Nonntal, HS Thomas Bernhard (E.001). Anschließend Netzwerkphase im Foyer im 1. UG - im Anschluss an HUMANS
    "Wer neue Antworten will, muss neue Fragen stellen." (Johann W. Goethe) - Gelegenheit dazu haben Sie im Unipark Nonntal, 18.1.2019, 08:00-15:30 Uhr
    Mit Entschließung vom 18. Juni 2018 wurde dem längst dienenden Lehrbeauftragten am FB Altertumswissenschaften der PLUS, Univ.-Lektor Lic. phil. Dr. h.c. Dr. phil. Günther E. Thüry vom Bundespräsidenten der Berufstitel „Professor“ verliehen.
    Mo 21.1.2019, 17.15 Uhr, HS E.001 (Unipark) - Dr. Louise Hecht (Wien, Potsdam) - Inklusions- und Exklusionsstrategien der jüdischen Aufklärung (Haskalah)
    INTERNATIONALE TAGUNG // Mi 23.1., 18.30h LESUNG Kathrin Röggla (Berlin): "Revision", Moderation: Bettina Hering (Leitung Schauspiel, Salzburger Festspiele) // Do 24.1., 18.30h W&K-FORUM: PODIUMSDISKUSSION mit Ulrike Hatzer, Hans-Werner Kroesinger, Kathrin Röggla und Christine Umpfenbach. Moderation: Christoph Lepschy // Fr 25.1. 19.00h THEATER "Röggla hat Angst. Ein Trimm-dich-Pfad für Angsthasen". Theater im KunstQuartier, Paris-Lodron-Straße 2a // www.w-k.sbg.ac.at/de/kunstpolemik
    Am Donnerstag, 24. Jänner 2019 geht ab 19.00 Uhr in Kooperation mit der ÖH Salzburg in der Hauptbibliothek bereits die achte Nachtschicht@UBS über die Bühne.
    Do 24.1., 18.30h PODIUMSDISKUSSION mit Ulrike Hatzer (Regisseurin / Mozarteum), Hans-Werner Kroesinger (Regisseur), Kathrin Röggla (Autorin) und Christine Umpfenbach (Regisseurin). Moderation: Christoph Lepschy (Mozarteum) // Theater im KunstQuartier, Paris-Lodron-Str. 2a // www.w-k.sbg.ac.at/de/kunstpolemik-polemikkunst
    Ein Szenenstudium nach Texten von Kathrin Röggla / 19 Uhr Theater im KunstQuartier | Paris-Lodron-Straße 2a | 5020 Salzburg // Eintritt frei, Zählkarten unter: +43 662 6198-3121 (Mo-Fr, 9-12h), schauspiel@moz.ac.at // www.w-k.sbg.ac.at/de/kunstpolemik-polemikkunst
    Die Schriftstellerin Cécile Balavoine verbrachte ein Erasmusjahr an der Universität Salzburg. Ihre Begeisterung für die Stadt Salzburg und die Musik Mozarts ist auf jeder Seite ihres ersten Romans MAESTRO spürbar.
    Einladung zur Tagung NEUERE ENTWICKLUNGEN IM EUROPÄISCHEN ASYLRECHT
    Am 31. Januar 2019 kommt Professorin Nadine Marquardt (Bonn) für einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Armut und Strafe" nach Salzburg.
  • Veranstaltungen
  • 16.01.19 Vortrag zum Thema: "Der Begriff der Krise bei Walter Benjamin und seine Relevanz heute"
    17.01.19 Smooth and non-smooth aspects of Ricci curvature lower bounds
    17.01.19 TAG des JUDENTUMS
    17.01.19 Vorträge der Salzburger Juristischen Gesellschaft
    18.01.19 HUMANS
    22.01.19 Knöchelspielende Kinder und streitende Knaben. Die Londoner Beißergruppe und ihr Umfeld
  • Alumni Club
  • PRESSE
  • Uni-Shop
  • VERANSTALTUNGSRÄUME
  • STELLENMARKT
  • Facebook-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Twitter-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Instagram-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Flickr-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Vimeo-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg