Daniel Shargel

Emotions Without Objects

The near consensus among theorists working on emotion, in both philosophy and psychology, is that emotions have objects. When we are angry, we are angry at someone. When we are frightened, we are frightened of something. We can call the theory that emotions have objects the Token Object Theory (TOKEN), though the defenders of this view are so numerous and diverse that they agree on little else. The ubiquity of TOKEN reflects, among other things, Brentano’s influence on the philosophy of mind. It is inconceivable that emotions would fail to manifest features which are taken to be characteristic of all mental states. Adherents rarely treat TOKEN as a theoretical position in need of defense, with empirically falsifiable implications. In fact, some relevant empirical work has been done. I will argue that this research supports an alternative model, the Type Influence Theory (TYPE), according to which emotions of a given kind influence judgements concerning a whole class of objects. For example, anger influences judgments about anything that seems offensive, and fear influences judgments about anything that seem dangerous. According to TYPE, emotions indiscriminately influence judgments about objects of a given type, while TOKEN, I will argue, implies that emotions influence judgments in a way that discriminates between tokens of the same type (e.g. judgments about different offensive things). This distinction allows us to empirically test these theories. Mounting a persuasive defense of TOKEN poses some serious challenges. It is not enough to argue that emotions do not have objects, I need to explain why it seems so clear to so many that they do. The view sounds extremely implausible, particularly to anyone steeped in the literature. In addition, I am arguing that a certain kind of effect does not exist, which is in general difficult to do. Given these obstacles, my more modest goal is to show that TOKEN is less well supported than philosophers tend to acknowledge, and that TYPE presents a challenge that defenders of TOKEN need to address. Part 2 will introduce a criterion for determining whether emotions have objects. In short, we should only consider a mental state, whether it is a belief, desire, or emotion, to be directed at object p, if it influences thought and behavior in ways that are specific to p. Intentional states satisfy this criterion even when there is no such thing as p. In Parts 3 and 4 I will discuss in detail the two psychological studies that form the basis for my argument against TOKEN. These studies are drawn from what is widely known as the emotional misattribution literature, since participants seem to be confused about the true intentional object of their emotions. I will argue that these studies are best interpreted as evidence that there is no true intentional object about which participants are confused. Instead, each type of emotion automatically influences judgments about a given class of phenomena, and tokens of the same emotional type influence the same class of judgments. Any token state of fear makes any apparently dangerous things seem more dangerous. Emotions seem, in part, to have more targetted effects because we often attribute to them intentional objects, and then selectively suppress emotional effects in a manner that is consistent with that attribution. This selective suppression is intrinsic to the emotion, so the emotion itself fails to satisfy my criterion.

In the remainder of the paper I will consider a variety of objections. I will begin by considering other interpretation of the studies, and argue that they are less well supported. The strongest alternative is the view that emotions have two types of effects: primary effects which are specific to the intentional object of the emotion, and secondary effects which apply more broadly. On this view, the studies demonstrate the existence of the secondary effects, but do not prove that there are no additional, object-directed primary effects. In response, I argue that positing these additional effects provides no theoretical advantage. There are no emotional phenomena that can be explained by appealing to this primary effect which I cannot explain with the secondary effect alone. This is a bold claim, and it is impossible in this paper to comprehensively survey emotional phenomena. However, I will discuss a number of factors which contribute to the general impression that we can only explain emotional phenomena by attributing intentional objects. My goal is to put the burden on my opponents to defend TOKEN, rather than taking it for granted.

  • ENGLISH English
  • News
    Ebensee ist bekannt, sowohl als historischer Ort der Salzverarbeitung, als auch des Konzentrationslagers im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Weit weniger bekannt ist die über 100-jährge Geschichte der Textilindustrie im Ort. Hunderte von Frauen waren über mehrere Generationen in der zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts gegründeten Spinnerei und Weberei tätig.
    Vergangenen Samstag, den 17. November 2018 wurde an den Arbeits- und Sozialrechtler Elias Felten und den Philosophen Michael Zichy, beide Universität Salzburg, der Kardinal-Innitzer-Förderpreis verliehen.
    Bühne frei für Ideen und Projekte, die euch am Herzen liegen! Eine Vernetzungsangelegenheit der besonderen Art bietet euch das Career Center am 20.11.2018 beim Fair & Creative Matching Event.
    Das Wissen für morgen schon heute erleben – mit diesem Ziel erarbeiten universitäre und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen in der Science City Itzling neue Vermittlungsformate.
    Im Rahmen von Wissenschaft-Praxis-Kooperationen für Unterrichtskonzepte mit digitalen Medien wird das Projekt EXBOX-Digital - Entwicklung und Evaluation von digitalen Experimentierboxen für den Chemie- und Physikunterricht der Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften an der PLUS School of Education durch die Robert Bosch Stiftung gefördert.
    Herr Dr. Sven Th. Schipporeit (Institut für Klassische Archäologie, Universität Wien) hält zu diesem Thema am Mi, 21. November 2018, 18.30 Uhr, in der Abgusssammlungs SR E.33, Residenzplatz 1, einen Vortrag
    Vortrag von Prof. Dr. Samuel Mössner, WWU Münster, am Mittwoch, 21.11.2018 um 18h im HS 436, Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät
    Sebastian Meyer hält am 23. November 2018 um 14:00 Uhr im HS 436 der NW-Fakultät einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships and their drivers in natural and anthropogenic systems with an emphasis on species interactions". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften lödt herzlich dazu ein!
    Christian Seiser hält am 26. November 2018 um 16:00 Uhr im HS 403 der NW-Fakultät einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 as regulators of cell fate decisions". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften und das ICA laden herzlich dazu ein!
    The workshop aims to examine the musicality of the body and vice versa the corporeality of music from a choreographic perspective. This approach corresponds with the extension of the concept of music as well as the questioning of performance traditions in the context of New Music, which also puts a stronger emphasis on the body.
    The relatively young democracy Poland, whose political climate has intensified considerably since the last elections, is also moving increasingly to the fore. Politically critical leaders of representative cultural organisations have been and continue to be replaced by the new administration, while independent creative artists appear to be able to find niches so far or already live outside the country.
    Vortrag von Felix Silomon-Pflug am Mittwoch, 28.11.2018 um 18:00 Uhr im HS 436, 3. Stock der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät, Hellbrunnerstraße 34
    Der Verein H.A.U.S. schenkt an zwei Tagen Punsch und Glühwein beim Advent am Alten Markt aus: Mittwoch, 28.11. und Donnerstag 29.11. Wir bieten sowohl Antialkoholisches als auch Hochprozentiges an, kulinarische Köstlichkeiten aus biologischer Landwirtschaft und Weihnachtsgebäck von lokalen Bäckern.
    Vom 29.11. bis 01.12.2018 im Unipark Nonntal
    Das Symposion der Katholische-Theologischen Fakultät findet am 29. und 30. November anlässlich der Aufhebung im Jahre 1938 statt. Veranstaltungsort ist der Hörsaal 101 der Theologischen Fakultät, Universitätsplatz 1.
    Salzburger Innovationstagung 2018 am 29.11.2018 ab 15 Uhr in der Großen Universitätsaula – ITG, Land Salzburg, Wirtschaftskammer und Salzburger Hochschulkonferenz
    Das Schlagwort "Open Access" ist nicht neu. Seit Jahren schon ist es in aller Munde und wird allerorts kontrovers diskutiert. Oft bleibt es jedoch lediglich beim philosophischen Theoretisieren, man ist es inzwischen fast schon müde. Was nun wirklich erforderlich ist, ist konkretes Handeln! Dr. Fund zeigt deshalb praxisnahe Wege und Möglichkeiten auf, die sich jetzt für Forscherinnen und Forscher ergeben.
    Am 30. November im Rahmen der Tagung Digital Humanities Austria 2018
    Ingrid Kohl hält am 30. November 2018 um 14:00 Uhr im HS 411 der NW-Fakultät einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Forschung im Wildnisgebiet Dürrenstein". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften lödt herzlich dazu ein!
    Am 6. Dezember 2018 finden an der Universität Salzburg die WTZ Training Days zum Thema Kommunikation, Dissemination und Verbreitung in H2020-Projekten statt.
  • Veranstaltungen
  • 21.11.18 Zeit und Kult in der Gründungsphase der neuen Polis Rhodos
    22.11.18 Affine vs. Euclidean isoperimetric inequalities
  • Alumni Club
  • PRESSE
  • Uni-Shop
  • VERANSTALTUNGSRÄUME
  • STELLENMARKT
  • Facebook-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Twitter-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Instagram-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Flickr-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Vimeo-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg