Hamid Taieb

Relatives and intentionality in Brentano?s last texts

In this paper, I will analyse the last texts of Brentano about the relational aspect of intentionality. I will show that Brentano goes more and more in the direction of a theory in which intentionality is a non-reducible real relative occurring even without an existing correlative. In other words, at the end of his life, intentionality becomes for Brentano what scholars call a “one-sided relation” (J. Haldane) or a “non-extensional relation” (R. M. Chisholm, A. Chrudzimski). To show this, I will use two series of manuscripts from the Nachlass. A first series is composed of unpublished texts, which are useful in understanding Brentano’s evolution concerning relatives and intentionality. A second series is composed of published texts used by A. Kastil in editing the Kategorienlehre. I will show that A. Kastil’s edition is not always faithful to the manuscripts. All the texts from the Kategorienlehre that I will use to support my argument will be compared to the sources in the Nachlass. A large number of scholars admit that Brentano’s last theory of intentionality is not a relational but an adverbial theory. The main source of this interpretation is a well-known text of 1911, in the Appendix to the re-edition of his Psychology, where Brentano says that intentionality is not a relative, but something relative-like (relativlich). Thus, since R. M. Chisholm, interpreters consider that Brentano has reduced, from an ontological point of view, the relational aspect of intentionality to absolute features of the subject, even if he maintained a relational « grammar » for intentionality (A. Chrudzimski, B. Smith). Nevertheless, it seems to me that interpreters provide no text where Brentano explicitly affirms the reduction of the intentional relative to absolute features. I will present a difficult text of 1908, unpublished, where Brentano discusses the interactions between the intentional relative and the absolute features of the subject. Regardless of this text, surely Brentano had an ontologically non-relational theory of intentionality in 1911, as he affirms it himself in the Appendix. However, I believe that things changed in 1915-1916. Indeed, in 1911, the reason for rejecting the relational aspect of intentionality was the absence of a correlative for some acts of thinking (some acts are directed upon non-existing objects, and no mind-dependent correlative can replace these missing objects). As we know, Brentano refused the existence of one-sided relatives in 1911. On the contrary, in 1915-1916, one-sided relatives are admitted: a relative exists even without an existing correlative. By the way, the relatives that were opposed in 1911 to the intentional act as being relatives having existing correlatives, namely the causal and the comparative relatives, will also become one-sided in 1915 (Brentano himself, in an unpublished text of 1915, uses the adjective “einseitig”). Thus, there is a reversal in Brentano’s ontology of relatives. I will show that the main text of the Kategorienlehre that establishes this reversal is a production of A. Kastil, who combined two different manuscripts. It is useful to emend this text, since scholars frequently quote it (L. Gilson, B. Smith, A. Chrudzimski, W. Sauer, M. Antonelli). Despite this emendation, the reversal can be proved.

Of course, one could object that this reversal does not imply that Brentano admits real one-sided relatives. One counterargument could be that Brentano generally reduces relatives to absolute features of their bearers (A. Chrudzimski); thus, the one-sided intentional relative cannot be real in the final analysis. This position seems to me to be questionable. I will show that there are many texts where Brentano says that relatives are as real as absolute entities. In fact, I think that Brentano increasingly affirms the reality of relatives. In an unpublished text of 1915, he considers that relatives are real, but reducible to the categories of the absolute accidents upon which they are founded. So, they do not form a proper category of accidents. But in 1916, in a text published in the Kategorienlehre, he affirms that relatives do form a proper category of accidents. Thus, the general reduction of relatives seems to be difficult to defend. Another argument against my reading could be that even if there is an increasing acceptance of the reality of relatives, this increase does not concern one-sided relatives, which can all be reduced to absolute features, even in 1916. I think that there are two reasons to reject this counterargument. First, Brentano, when he affirms in 1916 that relatives form a proper category of accidents, does not say that the category is limited to two-sided relatives. Second, in a text of 1916 published in the Kategorienlehre, Brentano gives the following list of relatives, containing mainly one-sided ones: categorial, causal, boundary, intentional and comparative relatives. Then, he says that the last class, the one of comparative relatives, is reducible to absolute properties of the bearer. Thus, by contrast, it is not the case for the other classes of relatives, including the intentional relative. Since in 1916 one-sided relatives are admitted, since they are real, since they are members of a proper accidental category and since only the comparative relatives are reducible to absolute features of their bearer, it becomes hard to explain how the intentional one-sided relative could be something else than a non-reducible real relative. I will provide criticism of this theory of intentionality.

  • ENGLISH English
  • News
    Am 28. und 29. März findet das Symposion von Dr. Robert R. Junker, Biowissenschaften, in Kooperation mit den DSPs "Dynamic Mountain Environments" und "Statistics and Applied Data Science“ als Auftaktveranstaltung des START Projektes (FWF) “Successional Generation of Functional Multidiversity”.
    Vom 29. Juli bis 30. August 2019 bietet das Kinderbüro der Universität Salzburg erneut eine Sommerbetreuung in den Räumlichkeiten der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät an. Kinder im Alter von 3 bis 10 Jahren werden durch erfahrene PädagogInnen betreut.
    Die Übung wird von der ZAMG, dem österreichischen Bundesheer und der Universität Salzburg organisiert und findet in der Schwarzenberg-Kaserne in Salzburg statt.
    Prof. Dr. Andreas Nehring bietet im SS 2019 Lehrveranstaltungen zum Thema "Hinduismus" am Zentrum Theologie Interkulturell und Studium der Religionen an
    Eine Train-the-Trainer-Workshopreihe am Programmbereich Zeitgenössische Kunst und Kulturproduktion In dieser Train-the-Trainer-Workshopreihe geht es um das Kennenlernen, Reflektieren, Erproben von verschiedenen Vermittlungsformaten, Toolboxen und Arbeitsmaterialien. Sie stellen unterschiedliche Annäherungsformen und Vermittlungsinstrumentarien für die Arbeit in Museen und Kulturinstitutionen, für die schulische Arbeit sowie für die Erwachsenenbildung zur Verfügung.
    Ringvorlesung im Rahmen der LV 999.922 Globale Herausforderungen im Sommersemester 2019
    with an excursion to the European Space Agency and a visit to the new VEGA observatory
    The (English-language) seminar on “Transnational Supply Chains and Domestic Human Rights Litigation” deals with legal questions that arise when human rights abuses in transnational supply chains give rise to domestic law suits.
    Walter Thaler hat sich nach seinen zwei Büchern über den Pinzgau wieder seinem bevorzugten Themenbereich gewidmet – der Provinz. Er zeichnet darin die Lebens- und Leidenswege von mehr als 60 Persönlichkeiten nach, die aus dem Pongau stammen oder einen wesentlichen Lebensabschnitt hier verbracht bzw. erlitten haben.
    Die frühneuzeitlichen transpazifischen Beziehungen sind vor allem wegen der berühmten Manila Galeonen bekannt, die zwischen 1565 und 1915 in regelmäßigen Abständen zwischen Manila und Acapulco den Pazifik überquerten. Große Mengen südamerikanischen Silbers, z.B. aus den Minen in Potosí, flossen damals über die Philippinen nach China. Doch nicht nur Seide fand im Austausch ihren Weg nach Lateinamerika. Der Vortrag möchte einige Einblicke in die vielfältigen, indirekten Beziehungen zwischen China und dem Vizekönigreich Peru geben.
    Am 20. März 2019 um 19 Uhr sprechen Lydia Mischkulnig, Kurt Neumann und Anton Thuswaldner über das Thema "Was ist gute Literatur?". Moderation: Manfred Mittermayer, Idee: Alfred Winter. Der Eintritt ist frei.
    Dr. Zsófia Horváth hält am 22. März 2019 um 14:00 Uhr im Hörsaal 421 der NW-Fakultät einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Saline pond metacommunities: from local stressors to landscape connectivity". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften lädt herzlich dazu ein!
    "Designing professional development of teachers to support domain specific thinking in history education"
    Dr. Eric Driscoll referiert über "The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Dienstag, 9. April 2019 um 13.15 Uhr - Residenzplatz 1 Stiege 4, SR. 1.42
    Ankündigung der ANTRITTSVORLESUNGEN von Univ.-Prof. Dr. András Jakab, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard Klaushofer und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sebastian Schmid - Fachbereich Öffentliches Recht, Völker- und Europarecht
  • Veranstaltungen
  • 19.03.19 Exkursion Magistrat Salzburg
    20.03.19 Tracking dynamic attention in perception, working memory, and action
  • Alumni Club
  • PRESSE
  • Uni-Shop
  • VERANSTALTUNGSRÄUME
  • STELLENMARKT
  • Facebook-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Twitter-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Instagram-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Flickr-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Vimeo-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg