Takuya Niikawa

Presentational Phenomenology and Phenomenal Character

The concept of phenomenal character of perceptual experience is basically characterized by the locution of “what it is like to have a perceptual experience” but this characterization should be further clarified (I call phenomenal character of perceptual experience PCP below). There are three important questions useful to characterize PCP in detail. The questions are as follows: (1) Should we accept “presentational phenomenology”, that is, it seems to one that one is aware of objects (Pautz 2007, p. 495) as the characterization of PCP? (2) Should we accept that we are actually aware of something (it might not be a concrete physical object) when it seems to us that we are aware of something? (3) Should we accept a principle that it is an essential component of PCP to be aware of something? How to answer these questions is crucial to evaluate philosophical theories of perceptual experience such as intentionalism and naive realism because the plausibility of the theories strongly depends on how to characterize PCP. The aim of this paper is to answer the three questions, and then to argue that a kind of intentionalism is not tenable, according to the answers. 1. My answer to the first question is as follows. if we reject presentational phenomenology as the characterization of PCP, then we have to devise an unnatural and technical characterization of PCP such as a characterization by using subjective indistinguishability, but it is unclear that such a characterization is able to grasp a pre-theoretical intuition about what it is like to have a perceptual experience; whereas presentational phenomenology is more compatible with the intuition. Therefore, it is plausible to characterize PCP by presentational phenomenology. And if you judge from your first person perspective that you have a perceptual experience but that it does not seem to you that you are aware of objects, then there are two possibilities: (a) what it is like for you to have a perceptual experience is extremely different from ours; or (b) you do not learn correctly the concept of being aware of”. The former is quite unlikely. The latter can be ignored. Therefore, presentational phenomenology has to be accepted as a character of the first person aspect of perceptual experience. 2. My answer to the second question is as follows. The expression “it seems to one that” in the formulation of presentational phenomenology can be interpreted in two different ways: epistemic and phenomenal. It is the phenomenal interpretation which is appropriate as the characterization of presentational phenomenology. In the interpretation, the fact that it seems to one that she is aware of something means that she has the same phenomenal impression as that which she enjoys if she is actually aware of something. If we accept presentational phenomenology in this sense, we have to accept that a subject can be actually aware of something, at least, in a class of perceptual experiences because otherwise we cannot understand what the phenomenal impression, which is supposed to be the same as that which she enjoys if she is actually aware of something, is. This is derived from the following principle: when X is characterized by being the same as Y, if there is no Y in any sense, then X is unintelligible.

3. My answer to the third question is that being aware of something is one of the essential components of PCP. According to the argument in section 1, PCP should be characterized by presentational phenomenology. It means that the concept of being aware of in the formulation of presentational phenomenology is not a third person concept. A concept is third personal if and only if the concept is characterized from the third person perspective. It might be possible to characterize the concept of being aware of from third person perspective, for example, by terms in cognitive neuroscience. However, concepts characterized in such a way cannot be used to characterize PCP because the concept of phenomenal character has to be the first person concept. Given that, it is plausible that the relation of being aware of constitutes PCP. The reason is as follows. If the relation of being aware of constitutes PCP, it is easy to understand how to acquire the concept of being aware of by reflection or introspection, that is, from first person perspective. On the other hand, if PCP is not constituted by the relation of being aware of, it is unclear how to acquire the concept of being aware of by reflection or introspection. 4. If, for a class of perceptual experiences, we have to accept that the relation of being aware of constitutes the phenomenal character, a kind of intentionalism is untenable. For example, the intentionalism advocated by Adam Pautz should be rejected. In his definition of intentionalism, PCP is completely grounded by a relation to an intentional content of the perceptual experience (Pautz 2010, p.258), and the relation is not a relation of being aware of. Therefore, even if Pautz accepts that we are aware of something in some sense, the concept of being aware of in his sense is different from one which constitutes PCP. According to the consideration in section 3, if the concept of being aware of does not constitute PCP, it is mystery how to acquire the concept of being aware of. Therefore, the concept of being aware of has been introduced illegitimately in his intentionalism; or the concept in his sense is third personal, and therefore, irrelevant to PCP. If the latter is true, although he seems to accept presentational phenomenology (Pautz 2007, p. 495), the appearance is fallacious. References: Pautz, A. (2007) “Intentionalism and Perceptual Presence”, Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):495-541. Pautz, A. (2010) “Why Explain Visual Experience in Terms of Content” in Perceiving the World, edited by Nanay, B., pp. 254-309.

  • ENGLISH English
  • News
    Am 28. und 29. März findet das Symposion von Dr. Robert R. Junker, Biowissenschaften, in Kooperation mit den DSPs "Dynamic Mountain Environments" und "Statistics and Applied Data Science“ als Auftaktveranstaltung des START Projektes (FWF) “Successional Generation of Functional Multidiversity”.
    Vom 29. Juli bis 30. August 2019 bietet das Kinderbüro der Universität Salzburg erneut eine Sommerbetreuung in den Räumlichkeiten der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät an. Kinder im Alter von 3 bis 10 Jahren werden durch erfahrene PädagogInnen betreut.
    Die Übung wird von der ZAMG, dem österreichischen Bundesheer und der Universität Salzburg organisiert und findet in der Schwarzenberg-Kaserne in Salzburg statt.
    Prof. Dr. Andreas Nehring bietet im SS 2019 Lehrveranstaltungen zum Thema "Hinduismus" am Zentrum Theologie Interkulturell und Studium der Religionen an
    Eine Train-the-Trainer-Workshopreihe am Programmbereich Zeitgenössische Kunst und Kulturproduktion In dieser Train-the-Trainer-Workshopreihe geht es um das Kennenlernen, Reflektieren, Erproben von verschiedenen Vermittlungsformaten, Toolboxen und Arbeitsmaterialien. Sie stellen unterschiedliche Annäherungsformen und Vermittlungsinstrumentarien für die Arbeit in Museen und Kulturinstitutionen, für die schulische Arbeit sowie für die Erwachsenenbildung zur Verfügung.
    Ringvorlesung im Rahmen der LV 999.922 Globale Herausforderungen im Sommersemester 2019
    with an excursion to the European Space Agency and a visit to the new VEGA observatory
    The (English-language) seminar on “Transnational Supply Chains and Domestic Human Rights Litigation” deals with legal questions that arise when human rights abuses in transnational supply chains give rise to domestic law suits.
    Walter Thaler hat sich nach seinen zwei Büchern über den Pinzgau wieder seinem bevorzugten Themenbereich gewidmet – der Provinz. Er zeichnet darin die Lebens- und Leidenswege von mehr als 60 Persönlichkeiten nach, die aus dem Pongau stammen oder einen wesentlichen Lebensabschnitt hier verbracht bzw. erlitten haben.
    Die frühneuzeitlichen transpazifischen Beziehungen sind vor allem wegen der berühmten Manila Galeonen bekannt, die zwischen 1565 und 1915 in regelmäßigen Abständen zwischen Manila und Acapulco den Pazifik überquerten. Große Mengen südamerikanischen Silbers, z.B. aus den Minen in Potosí, flossen damals über die Philippinen nach China. Doch nicht nur Seide fand im Austausch ihren Weg nach Lateinamerika. Der Vortrag möchte einige Einblicke in die vielfältigen, indirekten Beziehungen zwischen China und dem Vizekönigreich Peru geben.
    Am 20. März 2019 um 19 Uhr sprechen Lydia Mischkulnig, Kurt Neumann und Anton Thuswaldner über das Thema "Was ist gute Literatur?". Moderation: Manfred Mittermayer, Idee: Alfred Winter. Der Eintritt ist frei.
    Dr. Zsófia Horváth hält am 22. März 2019 um 14:00 Uhr im Hörsaal 421 der NW-Fakultät einen Gastvortrag zum Thema "Saline pond metacommunities: from local stressors to landscape connectivity". Der Fachbereich Biowissenschaften lädt herzlich dazu ein!
    "Designing professional development of teachers to support domain specific thinking in history education"
    Dr. Eric Driscoll referiert über "The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Dienstag, 9. April 2019 um 13.15 Uhr - Residenzplatz 1 Stiege 4, SR. 1.42
    Ankündigung der ANTRITTSVORLESUNGEN von Univ.-Prof. Dr. András Jakab, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard Klaushofer und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sebastian Schmid - Fachbereich Öffentliches Recht, Völker- und Europarecht
  • Veranstaltungen
  • 19.03.19 Exkursion Magistrat Salzburg
    20.03.19 Tracking dynamic attention in perception, working memory, and action
  • Alumni Club
  • PRESSE
  • Uni-Shop
  • VERANSTALTUNGSRÄUME
  • STELLENMARKT
  • Facebook-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Twitter-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Instagram-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Flickr-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg Vimeo-Auftritt der Universität Salzburg